Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to junghard.com

Magnus JJ · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
builtbynlb.com
Nicolas Le Borgne
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
artytech.co.uk 🇬🇧
ArtyTech ©
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aaandrangom.dev
Anthony Andrango | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
costatek.com
Costatek | Nearshore Software Development Costa Rica | Costatek
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
itech123.co.uk 🇬🇧
ITECH Southend
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
holmstain.com
Enes Mücahit | Holmstain
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alchemick.io
Bryan Stafford - Seattle, WA | about.me
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
2pha.com
Chris 2pha Brown | Freelance Drupal developer and web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
owenmcgirr.com
Owen McGirr
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
tharadonlabutda.com
Tharadon Labutda - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ashwin-portfolio.tech
Ashwin V Kumar - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ashrafulalom.tech
Ashraful Alom | Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
abomoaz.com
AboMoaz - Free Lancer Web and Mobile Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
achusree55.com
Freelance Web Developer and SEO Expert | Aswathy Sreejith
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bsproductbranding.com
Devoteq - Digital Excellence
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lucasvocos.com
Lucas Vocos
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lucas-vocos.com
Lucas Vocos
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
oyanadel.com
Home | Eric
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.