Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jungegren.com

Work | Philip Jungegren · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
juliapadget.com
Work | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
abrekov4u.com
Dima Abrekov - Digital Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
rebekahdaniels.com
Rebekah Daniels | Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
refikacimen.com
Refika Cimen - UX Designer | Product Design & UX Research
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
hollyhsiao.com
Ya Yun Hsiao — Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
bylase.org
Oluwaseun Jephthah — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
studiothis.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Studio This | Multidisciplinary Studio in Leeds
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
studiothis.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Studio This | Multidisciplinary Studio in Leeds
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
thisstudio.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Studio This | Multidisciplinary Studio in Leeds
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
judithmatute.com
Judith Matute | Product Designer & UX/UI Specialist
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
renatarocha.com
Renata Rocha - UX/UI & Product Designer, Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
holaliz.com
Lizbeth Martinez - UX & Product Designer | Portfolio & Case Studies
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
lonnychu.com
Your Name - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
rebeckaedward.com
Rebecka Edward Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
bruno-amorim.com
Bruno Amorim — Digital Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
jyliew.com
JY's UI/UX Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
bukunmiagbetunsin.com
Bukunmi Agbetunsin | Product (UI/UX) Designer | Nigeria
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
burnified.com
Mark Johnson - Product & UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.