Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juna-dev.com

Juna Dev — Project Previews · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
palmergill.com
Palmer Gill — Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bshepp.com
Brian Sheppard — Project Index
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bsheppard.com
Brian Sheppard — Project Index
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
4neko.org
4Neko Project page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
bukan.dev
bukan.dev — Developer Playground & Side Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
1projectperday.com
1 Project Per Day — Free Starter E-Book
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
owlos.app
owlos project
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
longliveglue.com
Tom's Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
tetsuo.dev
Project Tetsuo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
judahpemble.com
Project
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andypeterson.dev
Home | Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
4mbl.net
4MBL | Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
absolutejoe.com
Project Effable
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
8bitgoats.com
8BitGoats | NFT Project
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abrat.cloud
Abrat's Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
funkydev.io
FunkyDev — hub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
9lx.app
9lx — Infrastructure & Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
hnsideprojects.com
HN Side Project Directory
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.