Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jumacs.com

home | julia mccloskey · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
mrustdev.com
Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrewwerling.com
Andrew Werling - Technologist | Software Engineer | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
a1leadershipsolutions.com
Title
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
byteforgedynamics.com
ByteForge Dynamics - Expert Web, Application, and AI Developers
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
julivaro.com
Julian Varo | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
acerbi.dev
Emi Acerbi
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
asynctalk.com
AsyncTalk - 和我们一起,把 web 开发带向下一个高度
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
builtbydeion.com
Deion Graham-Long
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
eeturonkko.com
Erwd - Fullstack web development
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
julianlempe.com
About me | Julian Lempe
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
jurajslavicek.com
Juraj Slavíček
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
mourawebdev.com
Geraldo Moura Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
nibbletech.co.uk 🇬🇧
NibbleTech · Shaun Walker PHP Contractor
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
judithchen.com
Home | Judith Chen
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
atniwe.com
Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hitoritech.com
Hitori Tech | Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
msandhaus.com
For all your programming and tech support | Msandhaus.com
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hispakaz.com
Home | Kaz
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.