Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to juliecotter.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
38match
jfapress.com
Home
0 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
38match
jfamarkets.com
Home
0 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
37match
fettlin.com
Home
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
37match
nishigiefer.com
Home
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
37match
maxineswann.com
HOME
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
36match
goldenantelope.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
35match
debrasnow.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
35match
rogercolley.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
34match
lesleyjeanrenton.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
34match
jimlouis.com
Home
0 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryart-and-photography
34match
emmawerner.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
34match
alamoletters.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
33match
rachelsimon.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
32match
amritasenbooks.com
Home
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
32match
aldarthepuffin.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
32match
jennieoconnor.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
32match
jessgonzalezbooks.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
32match
megkeene.com
Home
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.