Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juliaday.com

Julia Day Books | Author Elizabeth Langston · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
donedonedraft.com
JoAnn Sky | Author and Editor
3 shared topicsromance
68match
bonniegardner.com
Bonnie Gardner, Author – Author of Contemporary Romance
3 shared topicsromance
67match
soniabolden.com
Sonia Bolden – contemporary fiction author
3 shared topicsromance
66match
ariannabeall.com
Author | Arianna Beall
3 shared topicsromance
66match
bobevery.com
Home - Bob Every, Author
3 shared topicsromance
66match
donnadeloro.com
Books and Poetry - Donna Del Oro
3 shared topicsromance
66match
ariacunningham.com
Aria Cunningham | Historical Romance Author
3 shared topicsromance
66match
maureenchild.com
Maureen Child, USA Today Bestselling Author
3 shared topicsromance
65match
mayabanks.com
Maya Banks | Contemporary Romance, Scottish Historicals, Romantic Suspense
3 shared topicsromance
65match
piyorapress.com
Piyora Press — Romance, Dark Romance & Nonfiction Books
3 shared topicsromance
65match
robynneeley.com
| Author | Releases | Robyn Neeley
3 shared topicsromance
65match
rohinisinghbooks.com
Rohini Singh Books - Stories thatstays with you
3 shared topicsromance
65match
romanceshortbooks.com
Romance Short Books
3 shared topicsromance
65match
billnolesjr-author.com
Bill Noles Jr. - Author
3 shared topicsromance
64match
bonnieleon.com
Bonnie Leon | Historical Romance Author
3 shared topicsromance
64match
maudewoodbooks.com
MaudeWoodBooks
3 shared topicsromance
64match
niademere.com
NIA DEMERE
3 shared topicsromance
64match
somewherelostinbooks.com
Somewhere Lost In Books – Romance Novel Reviews
3 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.