Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to julesstuart.com

Jules Stuart · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
69match
jamesroggeveen.com
James V. Roggeveen
6 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
61match
jihyeonje.com
Jihyeon Je
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
61match
georgehollyer.com
George Hollyer
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
57match
dewey-lab.com
Dewey Lab
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
54match
hobbservations.com
Andrew Hobbs
5 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
53match
kylemandli.com
Kyle T. Mandli
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
53match
balusreedhar.com
Balu Sreedhar
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
52match
maria-acevedo.com
Maria Acevedo
5 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
52match
matteovisconti.com
Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello, Ph.D.
5 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
51match
gudoshnikov.com
Welcome to Ivan's page!
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
50match
kyepalider.com
Kye Palider
0 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
50match
marcosmolla.com
Marco Smolla
4 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
50match
dfdar.com
Danish Furekh Dar
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
50match
anwarresearch.com
Dr Md Anwar Hossain
5 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
48match
guido-kraemer.com
Guido Kraemer
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
46match
kennylam8.com
Kenny Lam
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
46match
hemantika.com
Hemantika SENGAR
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics
46match
afurrybear.com
Yirong Xiong
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.