Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juked.com

Juked · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
julianaconverse.com
Words by Juliana Converse – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
buddhapress.com
Buddha Press | Fiction & nonfiction books for a better world
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
juliahalprinjackson.com
Julia Halprin JacksonJulia Halprin Jackson
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thecaprareview.com
A magazine of writing and photography
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
justinimpression.com
Just In Impression – Collection of fiction short stories and poetry
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
byaprilwilson.com
Home | April R. Wilson
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
brucejohnsonfiction.com
Bruce Johnson – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
rebeccaroselangston.com
Rebecca Rose-Langston – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
ackoch.net
A.C. Koch - Fiction and stories
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
rebeccaolmstead.com
Rebecca Olmstead ⋆ RebeccaOlmstead.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
cpboyko.com
C. P. Boyko -- Stories
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
reelnovels.com
REEL NOVELS - About
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
thebookofvoices.com
The Book of Voices
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
fushigistories.com
Fushigi's Lair | Web Fiction Written Here
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
julieleblancwrites.com
Julie Le Blanc | Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
mrsleifs.com
MrsLeif's Two Fangs About It
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
judealaska.com
Jude Alaska
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
simfictionreview.com
SimFiction Review | Fiction at the Speed of Code
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.