Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juicedup.dev

James White · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
judsonwhite.com
Judson White
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
aswwwanth.com
Aswanth A • Peerlist Profile
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
craigwhite-webdev.com
Craig White
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
abimaelespinal.com
Abimael Espinal
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
lucasjacques.com
Lucas Jacques
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ahvenniemi.info
Sami Ahvenniemi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
luanperosa.com
Luan Perosa
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrezorn.dev
Andre Zorn
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thealanmartinez.com
Alan Martinez - Software Engineer - Chicago
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
butler1970.com
Robert Butler – Senior Software Engineer / Senior PHP Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
lsphillips.com
Luke S. Phillips - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
adev.me
ash · software engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
brunobastos.com
Bruno Bastos | Software Engineer based in Vancouver, BC
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
judeswe.dev
Tristan's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
echooff.dev
Christian Rackerseder | Full-Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
luisbarros.dev
luis@portfolio:~$
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alexischavez.io
Alexis Chávez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.