Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juhanda.com

Portofolio - Juhanda Azril Kamal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
junkofujita.com
Portofolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
murtazakhaliq.com
Portfolio - murtazakhaliq.com
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
asmallworldafterall.com
Portfolio - Andrew Small
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
mrs-webstudio.com
Mrs Portofolio | Proiecte Web
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
justinlung.com
Portfolio - Home
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
register-dev.com
Portfolio | Jake Register
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
albertsites.digital
Portfolio - Albert Sites
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
lorele.io
Lo - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
munnaz.com
Portfolio | Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
aciobanu.dev
Amanda Ciobanu | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
mun-k.com
Mun's Portfolio - Frontend Developer & UI/UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
courtneyxreid.com
XL Studio | UX Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
palakdua.com
Palak Dua Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
ahmedadel.tech
Ahmed Adel Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
camerongraham.co.uk 🇬🇧
DevPortfolio - Freelance Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bytesizestudios.llc
Portfolio | Bytesize Studios LLC
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abhishekyadav.me
Abhishek Yadav | Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
hmujib.com
HKM | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.