Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jugaldb.com

Jugal D. Bhatt - Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
byrhys.dev
Rhys | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
juanlozada.com
Juan Lozada - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
adambelko.com
Adam Belko - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
jwsmithdev.com
Jordan Smith - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
moxtechdevelopers.com
MOXTECH Software Developers
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anmolagrawal.dev
Anmol Agrawal - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
kaanses.com
Kaan Ses - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
lourencohenri.com
HLDEV | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ozataabdullah.com
Abdullah Özata - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
luis-agm.dev
Luis Gonzalez - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
simidickson.com
Simi Dickson - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
simonecalabrese.com
Simone Calabrese - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
pacoguerraq.com
pacoguerraq | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
muddyworx.com
Muddyworx | A software development blog
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
burakbolat.com
Burak Bolat | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
julianvoros.com
Julian Voros | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.