Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to judekim.com

Jude Kim · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
judegordon.com
Jude Gordon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
judebissoon.com
Jude Bissoon — Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
judehunter.dev
Jude Hunter · Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
corykim.com
Cory Kim
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abhishekbr.dev
Abhishek BR
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
judenware.com
JudenWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buddhsentripathi.com
Buddhsen Tripathi
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
1wei.dev
Yiwei Ho
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
0xjosee.dev
0xJosee | Full-Stack Developer & Blockchain Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sirashmaharjan.com
Sirash Maharjan — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alejandroarciniegas.dev
Alejandro Arciniegas - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ahmadgraham.me
Ahmad Graham
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
luccahuguet.com
Lucca Beserra Huguet
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mumaritc.com
mumaritc — Full-Stack Developer & Infrastructure Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
panayiotistoumbas.com
Panayiotis Toumbas - Infrastructure Engineer, Software & Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
buildstack.digital
BuildStack — Practical guides for modern web developers.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
hkwebdev.com
HK Web Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
hoangvvo.com
Hoang Vo | Full-stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.