Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juanr.dev

Juan Ramirez · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
lorenzoramirezjr.com
Portfolio | Lorenzo Ramirez
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alejandroramirezposada.com
Alejandro Ramirez | Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
juanoa.com
Juan Otálora
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
juan-campuzano.dev
Juan Campuzano | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jramalho.dev
Jonathan Ramalho — React Native
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juanca.app
Juan Carrillo | juanca.org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
juanca.dev
Juan Carrillo | juanca.org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
juanquenga.com
Juan Quenga Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juancomella.com
Juan Comella – Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
3dgarnavarro.com
Edgar Navarro's website
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
juandk.com
Juan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abirhasansamir.com
Abir Hasan Samir | An Unidentified Science Aficionado
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juneau.ai
Juneau Dahl | Personal Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
justinsj.com
Justin San Juan
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
redhwan.com
Redhwan Rahi | Full-Stack Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanbuena.com
Juan Buena | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
abiram.tech
Abiram Ramasamy
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abymar.com
Abymar | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.