Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juanoa.com

Juan Otálora · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
juanr.dev
Juan Ramirez
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juanquenga.com
Juan Quenga Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
juandk.com
Juan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanca.app
Juan Carrillo | juanca.org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanca.dev
Juan Carrillo | juanca.org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juancomella.com
Juan Comella – Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
juan-campuzano.dev
Juan Campuzano | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanbuena.com
Juan Buena | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
silicon-nexus.com
Silicon Nexus
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alexcarpenter.me
Alex Carpenter
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
juanconvers.com
JUAN CONVERS — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
juanito.dev
Juan Hernandez | Polymath in Progress
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
justinsj.com
Justin San Juan
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
juanosorio.dev
Juan David Osorio Arrubla - Love Coding
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
juancarlosisordia.com
Juan Carlos Isordia — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
egouinguenet.com
Elouan GOUINGUENET
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
juanmazaragoza.com
Juan Manuel Zaragoza — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
juandagarc.com
Juandagarc Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.