Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juanmarcus.com

John Mark Mancol · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
abdulrahmanjabr.com
Abdulrahman Osama's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alberthernandez.dev
Albert Hernández | Backend Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
marshalltech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Jonathan Marshall
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ebube.dev
Chukwuma Ebube - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
corydio.com
Cory DioGuardi
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
egecanozer.dev
Egecan Özer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
loukaskotas.com
Loukas Kotas — Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
simonsinclair.com
Simon Sinclair
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
effigeniussolutions.com
EffiGenius - Web Development & Software Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kaartikgupta.com
Kaartik Gupta | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bruceldev.com
Bruce Lee - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bryanmendieta.com
Bryan Mendieta - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
creidenberg.com
John Doe - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
singingapple.com
Anurag Srivastava - Software Development Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thanhtrungdev.com
Nguyễn Thành Trung - Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abdulkhaliq.cloud
Abdul Khaliq | Software Engineer & Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
achille-david.com
Achille David
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.