Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to juandl.com

Juan F. De Luca - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
juanone.com
Juan F. De Luca - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
bytethecarrot.dev
Portfolio - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
eddymiguel.dev
Eddy Cedeño - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
pahasara.dev
Pahasara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
abelozerov.com
Alexey Belozerov - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
reganmuthomi.com
Regan Muthomi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
calebwharton.dev
Caleb Wharton - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juuni.dev
Junio Akarda - Software Engineer | Juuni
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kaartikgupta.com
Kaartik Gupta | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abirdey.tech
Abir Dey - Full Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adamrasheed.com
Adam Rasheed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
eddieb.dev
Eddie Benedetti | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
egecanozer.dev
Egecan Özer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adamgemperline.com
Adam Gemperline | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
jurajhamran.com
Juraj Hamran | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
luanpanno.dev
Luan Panno | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.