similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jtrives.com

J.T. Rives | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Lora Jones | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

burningblockstobuildingblocks.com

William Licea | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Sofia Yorke | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Andy Owens | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Tori Peters | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

B.R. Widney | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Wynn Kelly | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

julesarbeaux.com

Jules Arbeaux | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

corrinecoleman.com

Corrine Coleman | author

2 shared topicsfiction

julialinbooks.com

Julia Lin | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

fsautumnbooks.com

F.S. Autumn Books | author website

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

J.T. Grobler – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Jules Clark | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ozziecheekwriter.com

Ozzie Cheek | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

simondoylebooks.com

Simon Doyle | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

traceedehahn.com

Tracee de Hahn | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bryanoneill.com

Bryan O'Neill | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

abigailrosemarie.com

Abigail Rose-Marie | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.