Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jtkrueger.com

Jordan Krueger - Lead UX Designer in Seattle, WA, USA :: Behance · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
eleanzhukova.com
Product Designer - Elena Zhukova
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
paigesinger.com
Paige Singer - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
paigehonegger.com
Paige Honegger | UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
lonnychu.com
Your Name - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
justjevarus.com
Just Jevarus | UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
funmiportfolio.com
Funmilayo Makinde - Strategy & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
audrinaheng.com
Audrina Heng - Senior Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
rebekahdaniels.com
Rebekah Daniels | Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
costanaume.com
Konstantin Naumenko – Product Designer @ 2021 Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
juliaquillen.com
Julia Quillen UX Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
reidweigner.com
Reid Weigner - UX Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
brycewade.com
Bryce W. | Type Designer & Creative Technologist
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
cosasdelalinea.com
JM Serna — UX Designer · Granada
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
craigtuttle.com
Portfolio of Designer Craig Tuttle
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
craigtut.com
Portfolio of Designer Craig Tuttle
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
burnified.com
Mark Johnson - Product & UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
createdbymohit.com
Mohit Pareek — UI UX Designer in India | Created By Mohit
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
julieguarnes.com
Julie Guarnes - Graphic Designer UX/UI in Madrid, Spain :: Behance
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.