similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jtgrobler.com

J.T. Grobler – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ashleyschaller.com

Ashley Schaller – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jralexanderauthor.com

JR Alexander – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

brucefraserauthor.com

Bruce Fraser – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aubreybetzauthor.com

Aubrey Betz – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jtorresauthor.com

J. Torres – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

HOLLY HODDER EGER – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

J.R. Hebden – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Julia Satu – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Esme Carpenter – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

E. C. Rammel – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

rebeccaphelpsauthor.com

Rebecca Phelps – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

luannestewartauthor.com

Lu Anne Stewart – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rebekahsimmers.com

Rebekah Simmers – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

terrigreeningauthor.com

Terri Greening – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Terri Nolan – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

lucygoacher.com

Lucy Goacher – Author & Fox Lover

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

M.S. Harstine – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Julia Boon – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.