Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jsnlee.com

Jason Lee · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
ahmedmshaban.com
Ahmed Shaban
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
buildwithnama.com
Srikanth Nama — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
byjason.dev
Jason Pratama Sunarji — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abdulyusuf.me
Abdulrahman Yusuf || Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
atulkumar.dev
Atul Kumar
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
craigdg.com
Craig DG | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
hit-t.com
Yuhan Li
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
9reason.com
9Reason | Custom Software Development Agency in Winnipeg
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
eddysims.com
Eddy Sims
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
reidwatson.dev
Reid Watson Software LLC
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
bugdoubt.com
BugDoubt — Software House
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
craigselby.com
Craig Selby - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alfredoptarigan.tech
Alfredo Patricius Tarigan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
aaronmyburgh.com
Aaron Myburgh
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
muhammetdag.com
Muhammet DAĞ - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
reeganlabs.com
ReeganLabs | Software Solutions Agency
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
asherginting.dev
Asher Azriel Ginting - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
ahmadsoboh.org
Ahmad Soboh - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.