Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jsilcock.com

JSilcock – Writer, reader, science geek. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
funscienceclub.com
Fun Science Club
1 shared topicsscience
68match
siebertscience.com
Siebert Science – teaching | videos | writing
1 shared topicsscience
68match
juliannowogrodzki.com
Julian Nowogrodzki, science writer
1 shared topicsscience
68match
andycarstens.com
Andy Carstens – Freelance Science Writer
1 shared topicsscience
68match
atlsciencefestival.com
Atlanta Science Festival – March 7–21, 2026
1 shared topicsscience
68match
atlscifest.com
Atlanta Science Festival – March 7–21, 2026
1 shared topicsscience
68match
abbeyinterrante.com
Abbey Interrante – Writing, Communication, Science
1 shared topicsscience
68match
atasciencecouncil.com
ATA Science Council - Home
1 shared topicsscience
67match
123science.com
123 Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
juliannehodges.com
Julianne Hodges | Reporter, Photographer & Science Writer
1 shared topicsscience
67match
abingdonsciencepartnership.org
Abingdon Science Partnership
1 shared topicsscience
67match
reellifescience.com
ReelLIFE SCIENCE
1 shared topicsscience
67match
funtimelab.com
Fun Time Lab™ – Science Boy: Science Is A Superpower
1 shared topicsscience
67match
academy-science.com
Academy Science Practical Science Products - Academy Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
reckoningscience.com
Reckoning Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
academysciencecenter.com
ACADEMY SCIENCE CENTER - Home
1 shared topicsscience
67match
mrdanic.com
Mr Danic | Science lessons
1 shared topicsscience
67match
msoteam.com
Science Olympiad – Maryland Science Olympiad
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.