Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jsigal.com

Jesse Sigal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
jwlangford.com
Jesse Langford
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
0xbuidlerhq.com
0xhq
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jstorimer.com
Working With... - Jesse Storimer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
ozhmegov.com
IO
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lighthosting.co.uk 🇬🇧
SquidDev | SquidDev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ackx.net
Sugoi! - Youri Ackx
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pablogrius.com
Pablo García Rius - Python Data & Automation Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
fuelphp.com
FuelPHP » A simple, flexible, community driven PHP5.3 framework.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
juansedo.dev
Home | juansedo.dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
calebmharper.com
Main Page- Caleb Harper
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
junewunder.com
june wunder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
digitaldan.co.uk 🇬🇧
DigitalDan - Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
100daysofcode.com
#100DaysOfCode Official Website | #100DaysOfCode
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
refloat.dev
Float parser that sacrifices nothing | refloat.dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
julia-computing.com
Kretlow Consulting - Julia
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simonmweber.com
Simon Weber
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simonweber.com
Simon Weber
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
lucaswing.com
Lucas Wing's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.