similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jshakespear.com

James Shakespear 2021 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

James Smith • loopj.com

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

James Clarke Sturges

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

James Read's Homepage

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

justanotherdot.com

justanotherdot • Ryan James Spencer

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

James Scannell Some say I run on coffee

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

James Seaborn - Product Design - Actual Atom

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

The Felt Facade

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alanjames.org – Things I thought worth sharing.

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Simon Makes Stuff

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Lucas Makes Software

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

justriverjames.com

River James - Electronics Designer & Full-Stack Developer

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Mostly Technical Documents by James Z. – My Documents

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

9MODS - News, Updates, Games & More

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.