Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jshabun.com

Joshua Shabun · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
hoblitt.com
RTFM | [Read This Fine Material] from Joshua Hoblitt
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
1xengineer.dev
1xEngineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
eladshahar.com
Elad Shahar
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
abhin-sharma.com
Abhin Sharma
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
jsonobject.com
Taehyeong Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mozzafiller.com
Michael Shafer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
buildwithharry.com
Build with Harry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andrewmartinez.dev
Home | The Shade
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
butterythemes.com
nuro ─ engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
burglish.com
Burglish Test Engine
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
simshaun.com
Shaun - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kaanpeksen.com
Kaan P. | Computer Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mqrio.dev
Mario — software engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
camden-penn.net
Camden Penn, Computer Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
aniketray.me
Aniket Ray | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
brucemelo.com
Bruce Melo - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
hnaik.com
Harish Naik, Systems Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
mshafeeq.com
Home - The Embedded Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.