Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jsarmiento.dev

Jacob Sarmiento · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
angelpichardo.dev
Angel Pichardo · Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
jruizdeveloper.com
JRuizDeveloper
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
lsarmiento.dev
Luis Sarmiento | Portafolio Senior JavaScript Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
sistemas-web.com
Mantenimiento
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
movimientolibre.com
Movimiento Libre
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
angiematiz.tech
Angie Matiz — portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
jscsoftwarehouse.com
JSC Software House
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alex139139.com
Alejandro Cruz Bonilla | Alex139139
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
adriancosta.dev
Adrián Costa Rodríguez - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
adrianjimenez.dev
Adrián Jiménez | Desarrollador Web
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
theaddiesboutique.com
Carlos Amaro
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
1magen.com
Mantenimiento – 1magen
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
atevil.com
Atevil
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
edarmas.com
Eduardo
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juangarcia-dev.com
Juan García
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
eddcodelabs.com
Edward Muñoz | Desarrollador Web
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juanobando.dev
Porfolio de Juan Obando - Desarrollador y Programador Web
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexisvicentesandulache.com
Alexis Vicente Sandulache – Desarrollador Multiplataforma · Java, Web & Mobile
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.