similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to js-management.de

Js Management alternatives & similar sites

JS Management – Be assured of success with your conversational and business English projects. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
urszulahuntemann.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Embodied Business English Coaching - Home	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
heather-language-training.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Heather Language Training \| Business English & Sprachcoaching in München	DE de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expertenglish.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Expertenglish – Professional English Coaching & Consulting	AT de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expertdeutsch.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Expertenglish – Professional English Coaching & Consulting	AT de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceslanski.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Ruth Ceslanski Office Management	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
explore-english.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Explore English	AT de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happy-english-world.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Happy English World - Home	DE de	language-learning Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happyenglishworld.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Happy English World - Home	DE de	language-learning Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iks-sprachtrainings.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	IKS Sprachtrainings Regensburg - Business Sprachen	DE de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
finley.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	John Finley English Trainer in Vienna	AT de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
harveys-academy.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Business-Englisch-Training für Unternehmen in München \| Harvey’s Academy	de	language-learning TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
harveysacademy.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Business-Englisch-Training für Unternehmen in München \| Harvey’s Academy	DE de	language-learning TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ilaacademy.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ILA International Learn Academy Ltd. – Nachhilfe & Sprachschule	DE de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ila-academy.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ILA International Learn Academy Ltd. – Nachhilfe & Sprachschule	DE de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expert-english.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ihr Coach für expert englisch - Expert English	AT de	language-learning Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nexar-fuel.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Englisch lernen mit Freude – Nexar Englisch Akademie	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everything-english.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Englisch lernen mit Profis, Sprachschule Everything English	AT de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aaa-uebersetzungen.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AAA-Uebersetzungen - Deutsch / English / Italiano -->> Français, Winterthur Schweiz	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.