Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jrwinget.com

The Friction Point · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
jsonpoint.com
JSON Point
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
burakekici.com
Home | Burak Ekici
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
justinqxia.com
Justin Xia
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
murtadha.dev
Murtadha - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
mtnkenney.com
Matt Kenney | Matt’s personal website.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewrporter.com
Andrew Porter - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
reidswan.com
Reid Swan – Reid's personal website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewharrop.com
Andrew Harrop
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
creekmore.io
creekmore • home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewhorvatits.com
Andrew Horvatits
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
accipiter.org
Accipiter.org - I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
muhammedalidogan.com
Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bytedecoder.me
Rodrigo Reyes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
anhthongtran.com
Thong Tran
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
0rkun.com
Homepage - Orkun Mahir Kilic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bsalinas.com
Ben Salinas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
home-planets.com
Home Planets . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ – My personal websites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mrgrossman.com
MATTHEWGROSSMAN - Matthew Grossman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.