Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jrsanders.com

Home - J.R. Sanders - Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
jrpestel.com
Home - JR Pestel - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
juliashraybman.com
Home - Author Julia Shraybman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
junoharvey.com
Home - Juno Harvey Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
juditherwinauthor.com
Home - Judith Erwin Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
juditherwin.com
Home - Judith Erwin Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
julietsparkauthor.com
Home - Juliet Spark Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
alfredfdockery.com
Home - Alfred Dockery Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
byblakehill.com
Home - Blake Hill Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
ashleyjharmon.com
Home - Ashley J Harmon, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
alexandratarmstrong.com
Home - Author Alexandra T. Armstrong
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
adauzoije.com
Ada Uzoije - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
pageponder.com
Home - Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
adamjarvisauthor.com
Adam Jarvis - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
burtgolden.com
Home - Burt Golden, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
juniawonders.com
HOME - Junia Wonders
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
luigiakauthor.com
Home - LuigiAKAuthor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bryanteague.com
Bryan Teague - Author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
courtneypope.com
Courtney Pope - Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.