Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jroverton.com

John Overton - ./thoughts.sh · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
reginavlee.com
Home | Regina Lee
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abqcampbells.com
Home • Roger Campbell
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sitso.dev
Sitso: Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
simonwg.com
Simon Westlin Green
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
jwehliye.com
hey, i'm jaffer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ozenozkaya.com
Özen Özkaya | Personal WebSite
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
holgergarcia.com
Holger Garcia
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
furkanakdemir.com
Furkan Akdemir
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
andyyhy.com
andyyhy - Andy Yu Han Yang
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
asgb.me
Aaron Giordano-Barry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
munimadil.com
Munim Adil
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
jsolly.com
John Solly — Health-IT CTO at Leidos & Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
hmellema.dev
Hunter Mellema
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
hmellema.com
Hunter Mellema
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
overtooled.com
Overtooled
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
hiveready.com
HiveReady
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juliankingman.com
Julian Kingman - Ascended Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
theahmadshaker.com
Ahmad Shaker
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.