similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jrludwig.com

J. R. Ludwig – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Julia Boon – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Adam Mannan – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

K. A. Quinn – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ashlenbrown.com

Ashlen Brown – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

corytoscano.com

Cory Toscano – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kate W. Shea – author

2 shared topicsfiction

adamgochenour.com

Adam Gochenour – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

kamikazepotato.com

Kamikaze Potato – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

katrinamackrides.com

Katrina Mackrides – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

singingmagpies.com

Michael Pattarozzi – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alariccabiling.net

ALARIC CABILING's OFFICIAL SITE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

julialinbooks.com

Julia Lin | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ada Uzoije - Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

J R Lawrence | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

abbiewoodbridgeauthor.com

Abbie Woodbridge Author

2 shared topicsfiction

katharineannebrown.com

Katharine Brown | AUTHOR

2 shared topicsfiction

anniedonwerth-chikamatsu.com

Annie Donwerth-Chikamatsu | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Lyda's New Light – Author Site

2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.