Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jrlewi.com

John Lewis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
jsalako.com
John Salako • Career
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
andrewlandgraf.com
Statistically Significant
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mrkohli.com
Kohli-Space
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
owainlewis.com
Owain Lewis — AI Engineering
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
charlottejlloyd.com
Charlotte J. Lloyd – social/data scientista
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
silewis.dev
Silewis37's Blog
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
cambridgecheminformatics.com
Cambridge Cheminformatics Consulting – Dr Jon Swain, Data Scientist and Cheminformatician
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
eddiepease.com
Eddie Pease
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
julianmilner.com
Julian Milner
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lynnle.com
Lynn Le
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
louissoussand.com
Louis Soussand
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alexandermcintosh.com
Alex McIntosh • Data Science, AI/ML Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alexrodpas.me
Alejandro Rodriguez
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jsekhon.com
Jasjeet S. Sekhon - Yale University
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lovkush.com
Lovkush 🔸
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
thankjohn.com
Thank John
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
changmin-lee.com
Changmin Lee
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
chenglinyang.com
Chenglin Yang
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.