Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jrgaddam.com

Jayanth Reddy Gaddam - Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
eddycodes.com
portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
hoganmok.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
burkholder.io
Dean Burkholder - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
fudgemillionaire.com
Gabriel Catalfo - Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
loujvaughn.com
Lou Vaughn's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
alfredscyriac.com
Alfred Siby Cyriac's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
abnermolina.com
Abner's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
lucaswing.com
Lucas Wing's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
sidyajnik.com
SIDDARTH R YAJNIK // Portfolio Terminal
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
alexgrimm.dev
Personal Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
builtbyseb.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
padar.dev
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
lucwallace.com
Home / Luc Wallace
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ebenezerkouakou.com
Ebenezer Kouakou | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
lucaspaocoding.com
Lucas Pao's Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ankushraj.dev
Ankush Raj - Aspiring Software Developer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.