Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jreamit.com

jreamit | Cultural software and playful systems · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
jsmtux.com
jsmtux - Software architect
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
ludocog.com
LudoC⛭g – Game Design and Culture
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
mrinbit.com
MrinBit | Software & Game Development Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
owelo.com
Basement Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
a-maze.net
A MAZE. | Games and Playful Media
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
julieneveille.com
Julien Eveillé – Level, Systems and Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
pabloamaral.com
Pablo Amaral - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
nlpsystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
NLP Systems
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
multusoftware.com
multusoftware
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
adambradshaw.dev
Adam Bradshaw | Technical Systems Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
gaardbodev.com
GaardboDev | Games, software, and experiments
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
atmagaming.com
ATMA: Games and Cultural Products for Moral Evolution
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
alexshort.dev
Alex Short - Game Developer and Software Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
longshotsoftware.com
Long Shot Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
regil.io
Regilio Henry - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
terabit-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
TeraBit Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
terabitsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
TeraBit Software
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
buffystudio.com
Buffy - Game & Software Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.