Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jratte.com

Jeff Ratté | Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
eerim.dev
Erim | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
76match
adam-lindholm.dev
Adam Lindholm | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
btreiner.com
Ben Reiner | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abdin.net
Abdin Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewyancey.com
Andrew Yancey | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
5inalldesign.com
Matt Crandell's Portfolio | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
cakehole.tech
Kyle P. Cole | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ashbridges.dev
Ash Bridges | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
eddiechu.dev
Eddie Chu | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
msavoca.dev
Michele Savoca | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
loulopez.com
Luis Lopez | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
silviauzie.com
Silvia - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
buggerspot.com
Freelance Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
effostudio.com
Faith Ong | Web Designer + Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
frostner.com
Frostner | Web Designer & Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
bugginghere.com
Buggy — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
aniketraj.tech
Aniket Raj | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
acrowedesign.com
Alan Crowe | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.