similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jp-meyer.de

Jp Meyer alternatives & similar sites

JP Meyer – Online Marketing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Marketing And Advertising →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
adpace.de ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	ADPACE – Online Marketing Agentur	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexander-noack.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Noack – Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stroeer-online-marketing.ch ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Ströer Online Marketing	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexandergense.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	alexandergense.de – Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
justin-peter.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Justin Peter - Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
seeger-web.ch ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Seeger – Online-Marketing – and more	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apakillen.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - apakillen Online Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalimpactstudio.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Digital Impact Studio – Online Marketing Beratung	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentur-bemerkenswert.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home Main - Online Marketing Agentur	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3viertel.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	3viertel - Online Marketing Beratung	de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluevision.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	bluevision.ch \| ict online marketing	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentur-mucke.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Online Marketing - Agentur Mucke	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
online-marketing-experten.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Online Marketing Agentur Schweiz	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dachcom-onlinemarketing.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Online Marketing – Ihre neue Superkraft	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
joelreyes.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jorge Reyes - Online Marketing Expert	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
odenthal-solutions.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Odenthal Solutions - Online Marketing	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alohamedia.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Aloha Media \| Online Marketing Agentur	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pugstaller.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Online Marketing: Lukas Pugstaller	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.