similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to joupcraft.com

Joupcraft alternatives & similar sites

Jo Upcraft – Content creator | Editor | Writer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
johnmihaly.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	JOHN MIHALY MEDIA – Editorial, Copy Writing, Content Creation & Strategy	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseymoeckel.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Casey Moeckel – Writer and Content Strategist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swissmerzstudio.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	SwissMerzStudio – Personal Brand of Daria Merz, Content Creation	en	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsadlouskos.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	John Sadlouskos – Content Developer and Technical Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
falsebuddha.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	False Buddha LLC – Content Creation Consultants	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acewriteup.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	AceWriteup – Content Writing Services	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nataliezunker.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Natalie Zunker — Strategist, Writer, Editor	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drewtewksbury.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Drew Tewksbury. Writer, Editor, Producer.	en	content-production Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jose-vargas.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jose-Vargas - Creativity \| Content \| Strategy	en	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephaminian.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Joseph Aminian \| Expert Copywriting, Technical Writing & Content Creation Services	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturedword.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	The Cultured Word – Content strategy and professional writing by Vicki Taylor	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolineforan.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	caroline \| foran – Editor and Branded Content Specialist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joezagorskiinc.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Joe Zagorski, Inc., Copywriter, Content Producer, Tulsa, Oklahoma	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
crystal-chan.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Crystal Chan is a writer, editor & producer.	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayarziga.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Aya Rziga - Copywriter & Digital Content Strategist	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happyfuncontent.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Happy Fun Content \| Content & Creative Services	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
farflungfoodie.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Cynthia Barnes – Journalist, editor and content marketer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayscontentstudios.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	AYS Content Studios	en	freelance-writing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.