similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jonfaris.com

Jonfaris alternatives & similar sites

Team - AMS Planning & Research, Arts and Culture Consultants — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Management Consulting Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
pippawarin.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Pippa Warin – Arts and culture coaching and consultancy	en	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naphtaliconsulting.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Naphtali Consulting & Research	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altusplan.com.au ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Town Planning Consultants Perth	AU en	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nataliewilletts.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Natalie Willetts Research Consultant	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pissourios.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Pissourios Planning Consultants	en	management-consulting-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achimct.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Achim Consultants and Technologies	en	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3mphplanning.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - 3MPH Planning and Consulting	en	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbcresearch.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	BBC Research and Consulting	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hbaadvisors.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	HBA Advisors and Consultants	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3mresearch.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Statistical and Research Consulting	US~ en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3manalytics.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Statistical and Research Consulting	US~ en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pm-partners.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Project Management Consultants and Training \| PM-Partners	en	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casammakaquaculture.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Casammak Aquaculture Consultancy	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
morganagency.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Morgan // Culture Consultancy	GB en	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
usingevidence.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Using Evidence – a research and evaluation consultancy	en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awce.com.au ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	InStep Planning: Town Planning Consultants & Development Approvals NSW	AU en	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
catalyzeandcultivateconsulting.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Catalyze and Cultivate Consulting \| Culture Assessment	en	management-consulting-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
namixpcm.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	NAMIX \| Professional Project Planning & Control Consultancy	IN~ en	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.