similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jonathanjenin.com

Jonathanjenin alternatives & similar sites

Jonathan Jenin — Founder Advisor & Product Leadership Mentor — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nathanrohm.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Rohm - Product Leadership & Innovation Expert	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
nateholt.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Holt — Product Lead	US~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joewapshott.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Joe Wapshott — Hands-on Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joel-livermore.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Joel Livermore \| Product Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
salciotti.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Victor Salciotti, Product Design VP and Leadership Mentor	en	executive-leadership-and-management Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jrbond.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Bond - Product and Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natelevin.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Nate Levin — Senior Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamvargic.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Adam Vargic — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swetananda.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Sweta Nanda — Product Leader & Director	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avargas.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Alonso Vargas — Product Leader, Acquired Founder, AI Builder	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dennisdeboer.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Dennis de Boer — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dermotbuffini.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Dermot Buffini — Leadership Advisor & CEO Coach	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joemanbeck.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Joe Manbeck — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adambilisic.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Adam Bilišič \| CTO & Founder NodeonLabs \| Tech Leadership Mentorship	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avaronadvisory.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Avaron Advisory — CEO Leadership Architecture	AE~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanjamoll.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sanja Moll : Founder and Leadership Coach. Mediator.	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jonathantravis.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Travis — Engineering Leader & Platform Architect	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
naomisweet.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Naomi Sweet \| Strategic Advisor, Leadership Mentor & Healer	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.