similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to jonathanbossenger.com

Jonathanbossenger alternatives & similar sites

Jonathan Bossenger – Thoughts on open source, software development, and life in general. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
felipekb.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Felipe's Thoughts – A small blog to my thoughts on LabVIEW software development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casperfeng.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Casper Feng - Software developer, consultant, and nerd	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zuchos.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Software development and much more... \| Zuchos.com	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samclane.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sawyer McLane – Python, Embedded Software, and Game Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
azdanov.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Anton Ždanov - Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
batuhan.me ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Batuhan Kök · Senior Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beaninjections.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Bean Injections: A Blog About Java, software development, linux, hacking and More	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdummy.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	DevDummy : Software Development Guide ...	en	programming-languages Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developeraspirations.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Aspirations of a Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
samthesoftwareman.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sam the Software Man \| Thoughts and teachings on computer science, software engineering/development, as well as general technology topics. Lessons that I wish had been taught to me early in my career as a programmer.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayanb.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Ayan Banerjee \| Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luigicruz.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Luigi Cruz - Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developmentsimplyput.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Development Simply Put \| Software Engineering Hub	en	technology-and-computing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
salvarado.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Santiago Alvarado - CS Student & Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abhilashps.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abhilash PS — Engineering Thought & Software Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
falkenby.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Full-Stack Developer \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandeepbhaisora.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Sandeep Bhaisora - Software Developer \| Java, Spring Boot, AWS, Microservices	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dinkomarinac.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Dinko Marinac \| Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.