Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jointventures.com

Joint Ventures — Venture Intelligence | JointVentures.com · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
92match
itventures.com
It Ventures — Venture Intelligence | ItVentures.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
91match
bidventures.com
Bid Ventures — Venture Intelligence | BidVentures.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
90match
academyventures.com
Academy Ventures — Venture Intelligence | AcademyVentures.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
84match
miamiventure.com
Miami Venture — Miami's venture network | MiamiVenture.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
82match
microshares.com
Microshares — Smart Entity | Microshares.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital
82match
gventures.com
G Ventures — Venture Intelligence | GVentures.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
81match
jampoint.com
Jam Point — Smart Entity | JamPoint.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorystartups
81match
javapoint.com
Java Point — Smart Entity | JavaPoint.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorystartups
81match
laguides.com
La Guides — Smart Entity | LaGuides.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorystartups
81match
myexamples.com
My Exam Ples — Smart Entity | MyExamPles.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorystartups
81match
islandwines.com
Islandwines — Smart Entity | Islandwines.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorystartups
81match
fashionpoints.com
Fashion Points — Smart Entity | FashionPoints.com
10 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.