similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to johnfass.com

Johnfass alternatives & similar sites

fevered imaginings | Interaction design, user interface design, design research, data visualisation and some other cool stuff I've been working on — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cascade-sg.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	CASCADE Singapore Design Studio \| Brand Identity, Data Visualisation & Interactive Playbooks	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curtbydesign.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	curtis.is : Product Design \| Interaction \| User Experience \| Mobile Design \| Saas \| Motion	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jonaslehec.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Interaction design for screens	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonrossi.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jonathon Rossi \| Industrial & Interaction Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
freestate.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hassell \| We design places people love. Award-winning architecture, urban design, interior design and landscape architecture.	GB en	design Kirby	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designfacility.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home \| DesignFacility: design, research, visualisation	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephricafort.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Data Visualization Designer & Creative Developer \| Joseph Ricafort	PH~ en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academyixd.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	School of Interaction & UI/UX Design at the Academy of Art	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designwithnoa.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design with Noa — Graphic and Interactive Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsonkenisha.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Johken Design, LLC – Presentation design and data visualization.	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
federicopeliti.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Federico Peliti — Interaction & Service Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
samuelakintunde.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Akintunde — Innovation Strategist & Interaction Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happymousestudio.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Happy Mouse Studio \| Illustration and Surface Pattern Design Studio Happy Mouse Studio \| Illustration and Surface Pattern Design Studio	GB~ en	design Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonasmai.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jonas Mai – Interaction Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucasingramdesign.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Lucas Ingram Design – Visual Design and Realization	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cumulusassociation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cumulus \| Global Association of Art and Design Education and Research	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5wgraphics.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	5W GRAPHICS \| Information graphics, data visualization, diagrams, design and illustration	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hannahboom.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Graphic Design, Web Design, Event Space and Ilustration work by Hannah Boom	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.