similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to johncillie.com

Johncillie alternatives & similar sites

John Cillie - Director of Product | Product Leader & Engineering Expert — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
derekgates.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Derek Gates - Experienced Digital Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josuetello.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Josue Tello — Senior Product & Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samantharadams.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Samantha Adams — Director of Product Management	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
utsabpant.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Utsab Pant \| Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swati-sahu.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Swati Sahu \| Product Manager & Digital Transformation Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanrohm.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Rohm - Product Leadership & Innovation Expert	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ludvikproduct.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Kyle Ludvik \| Senior Director of Product Management	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saminsaju.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Samin Saju \| Strategic Leader & Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joaquinoribe.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Joaquin Oribe - Engineering Manager & Technical Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
john-cline.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	John Cline - Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
navarych.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Raman Navarych - Engineering Manager & Head of Department	PL~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonahsduran.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jonahs Duran — Product Manager & AI Strategy Expert	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
joel-livermore.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joel Livermore \| Product Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jpconner.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	James Patrick Conner Jr. - VP/Director of Product	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
surumyasharma.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Surumya Sharma \| Product Manager Portfolio	IN~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joelcloralt.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joel Cloralt - Product Management Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathantravis.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Travis — Engineering Leader & Platform Architect	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nataliecervantes.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Natalie Cervantes \| Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.