Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jmalvey.com

Juliet E. McKenna – Fantasy Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
mayadrakes.com
Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
82match
robert-nakamura.com
Robert Nakamura – Grimdark Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
78match
fayefrossiart.com
Faye Frossiart – Fantasy
1 shared topicsfantasy
78match
irenetopaloglou.com
Irene Topaloglou – Epic Fantasy Author & Illustrator
1 shared topicsfantasy
75match
akwarnockwrites.com
AK Warnock - Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
75match
dnhoxa.com
Fantasy Author | Dnhoxa.com
1 shared topicsfantasy
74match
benhallaways.com
Ben Hallaways – Author of Historical Fantasy Fiction
1 shared topicsfantasy
73match
feolnir.com
fëolnir – epic fantasy web novels
1 shared topicsfantasy
72match
arlach.com
A.R Lach | fantasy author
1 shared topicsfantasy
72match
ariettacharles.com
Arietta Charles | Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
72match
ipkollias.com
I.P.Kollias - Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
71match
alexsteele.net
Alex Steele Author – Fantasy lives here
1 shared topicsfantasy
70match
rjpelayo.com
R.J. Pelayo | Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
70match
6ixthorder.com
Home | The Sixth Order Jarret Madden Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
dmsalas.com
D.M. Salas Middle-Grade Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
andrewpmeritt.com
Andrew P Meritt | Grimdark Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
fatimabader.com
Fatima Bader – Fantasy With A Twist
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
andrewplatten.com
Andrew Platten | Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.