Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jinyeon.com

진연 Jinyeon · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
71match
jangins.com
장인닷컴 | 장인의 기술, 우리의 일상
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
71match
japjidoctor.com
잡지닥터
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
71match
bangzza.com
방짜배터리
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
bogangst.com
(주)보강에스티
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
68match
jjonduk.com
쫀덕
7 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
coverdbon.com
COVERDBON
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
67match
cowellcosmedi.com
코웰
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
66match
cothekoo.com
코더쿠 COTHEKOO
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
jjbooboomall.com
정전부부몰
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
kizbell.com
키즈벨
6 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
hamkibara.com
함끼바라
6 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
jjshopkorea.com
[제이제이샵코리아] 브랜딩 디자이너들이 작업한 감각적인 카페 포스터
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
cellifarm.com
첼리팜스토어
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
cpromarine.com
씨프로마린
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
mediwini.com
mediwini
8 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
bontamall.com
본타몰 세계요리재료 전문몰
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
jemischool.com
대한민국 대표 문구전문쇼핑몰 모닝오피스
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
jenays.com
제나 JENA 쇼핑몰 | 마사지젤 스킨케어 러브젤 러브제리 부부관계젤
7 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.