Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jinniekim.com

Yeonjinkim · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
julianodonnell.com
Portfolio
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
juliannabach.com
Studio J.B.
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
juleskupperman.com
Jules Kupperman Design
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
kanarakis.com
kanaraki
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
kyasui.com
Koyuki Yasui
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
kyra-smith.com
Kyra's Portfolio
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
malikakhurana.com
Malika Khurana
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
manuandenri.com
Manu&Enri
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
manuelabarretot.com
manuelabarretot
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
jiapingchendesign.com
UP
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
jin-kim.com
Jin Kim
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
joanapestana.com
Joana Pestana — Design
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
hausofsa.com
Haus of Sa
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
griffhecht.com
Griff Hecht
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
gudnysara.com
Guðný Sara
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
85match
aoesef.com
OESEF
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
baijingzi.com
WhiteMirror | 白镜子设计
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
cesarmafra.com
cesarmafra
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.