Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jimjonze.com

Jim Jonze · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
75match
jeraliey.com
Jeraliey
5 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
65match
akersmusicart.com
Akers Music
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
63match
niktee.com
nik tee/homepage
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
62match
blindheadmusic.com
Blindhead
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
62match
studiojambo.com
Benjamin Longmire
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
62match
maxlilja.com
Max Lilja
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
ajlexico.com
AJLEXICO
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
noeltsoukalas.com
Noël Tsoukalas
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
rachelcroweband.com
Rachel Crowe Band
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
doubledowntimeband.com
DoubleDownTime
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
grammara2m.com
Grammar
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
orbitsmusic.com
Orbits
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryjazz
60match
ronninband.com
Ronnin
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
60match
jimearleymusic.com
Jim Earley
5 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryrock-music
58match
aivilarecords.com
Aivila
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
58match
emmetmichaelmusic.com
Emmet Michael Music
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryalternative-music
58match
deanandbritta.com
Dean & Britta
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
58match
apoorvamusic.com
Apoorva
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymusic

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.