Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jimbobarbu.com

Studio Jimbo · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
63match
eliottyonts.com
Eliott Yonts
3 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
61match
jnaefox.com
Studio Fox
3 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
57match
holagise.com
gisela arevalos
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
48match
mantaspalaima.com
Portfolio of one geeky designer
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
48match
jamiewaelchli.com
Jamie Marie Waelchli
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
46match
jhenying.com
jhenying design
2 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
46match
hatayurie.com
hata yurie
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
46match
janvankampenhout.com
Studio Van Kamp & Hout
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
44match
dianaokuma.com
okuworks
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
44match
jarederickson.com
Jared S. Erickson
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
43match
jaredsoaresprojects.com
Journal
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
43match
kentkerr.com
D. Kent Kerr
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
42match
hesoe.com
HES
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
41match
elineceelen.com
Eline Ceelen
2 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
41match
bonnsant.com
Bonnie Sant
1 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
40match
dhlikes.com
D&H Likes
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
40match
majajovicic.com
M A J A
0 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
40match
barbaroart.com
barbaroart
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydigital-arts

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.