Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jillaster.com

Jill Aster · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
62match
jillianwalshromance.com
Jillian Walsh
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
62match
corannaadams.com
Coranna Adams
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
62match
hanameadows.com
Hana Meadows
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
61match
jillyharrisonauthor.com
Jilly Harrison
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
60match
margocarey.com
Margo Carey
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
60match
hazelkford.com
Hazel K Ford
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
60match
coracraneauthor.com
Cora Crane
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
59match
maisymagill.com
Maisy Magill
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
59match
bamilsopbooks.com
B. A. Milsop
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
59match
elamypride.com
Elamy Pride
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
58match
juliearichman.com
Julie A. Richman
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
56match
corayoungbooks.com
Cora Young
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
55match
joannebarnesbooks.com
Jo Anne Barnes
1 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
54match
elisegedickeauthor.com
Elise Gedicke
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
53match
jgthorneauthor.com
J. G. Thorne Author
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryromance
52match
ivylenox.com
Ivy Lenox
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
50match
jennatorren.com
Jenna Torren Author
2 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance
50match
celestedador.com
Celeste C.C. Dador
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.