Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jfworks.de

Portfolio - jfworks · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
levinwitjes.com
Levin Witjes Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
rominaschoeni.com
Romina · UX Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
cgworks.de 🇩🇪
Creative Graphics – Das Online Portfolio von J. R. Seibel
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
niklashahn.com
Niklas Hahn – Human Centered Design – Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
nicolekloeters.com
Nicole Klöters | UX-Designer – Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
floheinke.com
Florian Heinke
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
holbwegs.com
holbwegs DESIGNEREI - Grafikdesign Deutschnofen
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
holfeuer.com
Holfeuer Flachglasdesign
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
it-brb.com
7i7® | Europas Nr. 1 Design Flatrate: Made in Germany
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
alexanderpfaffenrot.com
Alexander Pfaffenrot - Alexander Pfaffenrot
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
alexanderpruemm.com
Alexander Prümm – Service & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
alexbart.com
CreativHub
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
blackjaguardesign.com
BlackJaguarDesign
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
blaukontor.com
Blaukontor für Gestaltung - Ihre Designagentur in Bremen für Print und Digital
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
blickwinkel-digital.com
Usability Studio by Blickwinkel-Digital
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
defifee.com
Aniko Atilla
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
feuerreiter.com
Feuerreiter - Visuelle & Digitale Gestaltung
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
impulslabor.com
impuls labor design / Start
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.