Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to jfutter.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
handprintedworks.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
85match
elitepetiteart.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
80match
kentalastudios.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
77match
coridietsch.com
Cori Dietsch - Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
75match
malgraphy.com
malgraphy - GRAPHIC DESIGN
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
75match
janemilestheatre.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
75match
jimcollinsartwork.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
75match
binmade.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
75match
dianelinquataart.com
Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
75match
elainesantore.com
ELAINE SANTORE - Contact
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
72match
jennajacobsart.com
Jenna Jacobs - Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
72match
jingersnap.com
JingerSnap.com - Home
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
71match
arphathip.com
A. Padhanarath (Earth) - HOME
1 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
70match
jenniferadamwriter.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
70match
juliebrennanfelt.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
70match
janecalvin.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art-photography
70match
jjsipes.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
70match
greenlocaldrama.com
Home
1 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorytheater

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.